Singapore Feels Less Safe Lately — But Is It?

When people say Singapore is "safe," they usually mean more than one thing at once, and it's worth pulling those apart. There's the safety of being able to walk home at night without worrying about being robbed. There's the safety of living in your own home without worrying about a fire. There's the safety of getting from one place to another without worrying about being killed or injured on the way. And there's a quieter, bigger one: the safety of simply not having your life upended by a natural disaster you had no way to prepare for.

At the 2015 St Gallen Symposium, Tharman Shanmugaratnam — then Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance, now President of Singapore — pointed to the first of these when the BBC's Stephen Sackur pressed him on press freedom. Liberty, he argued, also means "being able to walk the streets freely, particularly if you're a woman or a child, at any time of the night" — something he said many societies simply don't have. It's one way of weighing what matters most, not the only way, and reasonable people can order these freedoms differently. But it names something most people who grew up in Singapore have never had to think about, because all four kinds of safety above have simply always been there. Recent headlines about fires, road accidents, and crime raise a fair question: is any of that changing?

The wrong question, and a better one

"Is Singapore becoming less safe?" is the instinctive question, and it's the wrong one to lead with — because it treats "safety" as a single dial, when it's really four different things that can move in four different directions at once. A single dashcam clip or viral post can make all of them feel like they're moving together, even when they aren't.

The more useful question has two parts: how does Singapore actually compare globally on each of these, and separately, which of them are genuinely shifting right now? The first tells you how rare what you have actually is. The second tells you whether it's still there. Both require going to the data instead of the feeling.

Four kinds of safety, one global snapshot

Here's how Singapore compares internationally across each dimension, using the most recent global data available for each:

Form of safety	Metric	Singapore	Global comparison	Source
Walking home without fear of crime (how safe people feel)	% of adults who feel safe walking alone at night	98% — ranked #1 of 144 countries/territories	Global average: 73%; United States: 71%; lowest-ranked (South Africa): 33%	Gallup Global Safety Report, 2025
Walking home without fear of crime (actual risk)	Intentional homicide rate per 100,000 people	0.07	Global average: 5.2; United States: 5.0; United Kingdom: 1.0; Japan: 0.2	UNODC/World Bank data, 2023, via Frost & Sullivan Institute
Traveling without fear of injury or death	Road traffic death rate per 100,000 people	1.9 (2021)	Southeast Asia average: 14.4; Asia-Pacific average: 15.2; United States: ~14.2; Thailand: ~25.4; Vietnam: ~30.6	Asian Transport Observatory, Singapore Road Safety Profile 2025; WHO-based global estimates
Living your life without a natural disaster upending it	World Risk Index score (hazard exposure + vulnerability; lower = safer)	0.67 — among the lowest worldwide	Philippines: 46.56 (highest risk); Indonesia: 39.80; Japan: 24.81; Monaco: 0.18 (world's lowest)	World Risk Index 2025 (Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft / IFHV), reported via WorldPopulationReview

By any of these four measures, what Singapore residents live with is not the global norm. It's closer to the exception.

But averages don't move — recent trends do

A country can hold an enormous global lead on a measure and still be moving in the wrong direction inside that lead. That's worth checking separately, dimension by dimension, using Singapore's own recent data.

Violent crime has stayed essentially flat. Crime against persons has moved in a narrow band of roughly 75 to 87 cases per 100,000 residents over the past four years (SPF Annual Crime Brief 2025). Overall physical crime rose 4.4% in 2025 — from 19,969 to 20,857 cases — but SPF itself describes this as a "minor uptick", and theft still makes up roughly 40% of all crime, with violent offences comparatively rare. The incidents that dominate social feeds stand out precisely because they're unusual — a video travels because it isn't normal, not because it's becoming normal.

Home safety from fire has genuinely worsened. SCDF responded to 1,051 residential fire calls in 2025, 8.6% more than the year before, and fires involving personal mobility devices (PMDs) rose 24% to 31 cases (SCDF fire data, Feb 2026). A fatal fire in Bukit Merah in August 2025 was likely linked to a PMD battery. Two factors sit behind this: the growth of PMDs and lithium batteries, and the fact that only around 17% of HDB flats had fire alarms installed as of June 2025 (MHA). This is a multi-year trend, though fire fatality counts are small enough in absolute terms that a single tragedy can look like a bigger shift than it is.

Travel safety has moved the most sharply. Road fatalities climbed from a 2021 low of around 85 to 149 in 2025 — the highest in a decade — and injuries rose 6.6% year-on-year to 9,955 (SPF Annual Road Traffic Situation 2025). This risk isn't spread evenly: elderly pedestrians, 12.9% of the population, accounted for 75% of fatal pedestrian accidents, with deaths more than doubling — from 11 in 2024 to 27 in 2025. Motorcyclists, roughly 15% of the vehicle population, were involved in 54.8% of accidents and 53.8% of fatalities (Mothership, citing SPF data). Part of this rise likely reflects a rebound from artificially low 2020–2021 numbers during stay-home periods, layered with the genuine growth of delivery and ride-hailing work and an ageing population.

Put next to the global table above, the picture gets more precise: Singapore's edge on road safety (1.9 per 100,000 versus a regional average around 14–15) is still enormous, but the trend inside that edge has clearly turned — worth real attention, especially for the two groups carrying most of the added risk.

The insight: rare things are easy to stop noticing

Something that has always been present is easy to stop seeing — that's as true of personal safety in Singapore as it is of a data pipeline nobody double-checks because it's "always worked." The table above is really a way of restoring that visibility: 98% feeling safe walking alone at night, a homicide rate a fraction of the global average, road deaths at roughly a tenth of the regional rate, and one of the lowest natural-disaster risk profiles in the world — held at the same time — is not the default condition of being alive somewhere. It's closer to a global outlier.

None of that is a reason to wave away the trends that are moving the wrong way. It's the opposite: knowing how rare the baseline is makes it more worth protecting, not less. The habit that matters here isn't reassurance or alarm — it's separating "this is loud" from "this is rising," and separating both of those from "this is rare by world standards." That's a transferable skill well beyond safety statistics: the same discipline is needed before reacting to any single data point, whether it's a viral clip, a quarterly sales dip, or a customer complaint that feels like a pattern.

Where this leaves us

Safety was never one number, and the data bears that out: on crime, Singapore's edge over the rest of the world is stable and enormous. On natural disasters, it's structural and close to unmatched. On home fires and road deaths, the long-run global comparison still favours Singapore heavily, but both trends have turned upward in the last few years and deserve specific, targeted attention — PMD battery fires in older HDB flats, and road deaths concentrated among elderly pedestrians and motorcyclists.

Holding both ideas at once — a set of freedoms that are genuinely rare in global terms, and a couple of trends worth watching closely — is more useful than picking a side in an online argument about whether Singapore is "going downhill." The data isn't asking anyone to feel more anxious or more complacent. It's asking for specificity about which kind of safety, and for whom.

If you enjoy practical analytics content like this, consider subscribing for more articles on data analytics, AI, visualisation, decision science, and data storytelling. Subscribe here

If you or your team are looking to build practical data and AI capabilities, feel free to reach out to us at FYT Consulting. Contact us